Current:Home > FinanceFormat of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents -WealthMindset Learning
Format of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents
PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-08 14:26:43
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Opponents of the Dakota Access oil pipeline are taking issue with the format of private oral testimony in meetings for public comment on a draft environmental review of the controversial pipeline.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the midst of two public comment meetings in Bismarck, North Dakota, the first held Wednesday, the second set for Thursday. People wishing to give testimony may do so orally in a curtained area with a stenographer, or do so in writing at tables.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has long opposed the pipeline due to the risk of an oil spill contaminating the tribe’s drinking water supply. The four-state pipeline crosses under the Missouri River just upstream of the tribe’s reservation.
The long-awaited draft environmental review, released in September, outlines five options for the pipeline’s fate. Those include denying the easement for the controversial crossing and removing or abandoning a 7,500-foot (2,286-meter) segment, or granting the easement with no changes or with additional safety measures. A fifth option is to reroute the pipeline north of Bismarck, which would require new state, local and federal permits.
Many opponents of the pipeline had hoped Wednesday’s meeting would have allowed them to publicly question the Corps and pipeline developer Energy Transfer, The Bismarck Tribune reported.
Joe Lafferty, a Native American activist who opposes the pipeline, poured oil and water into a cup and challenged Corps officials to take a drink.
“If it means so much to you, I want you, DAPL, Army Corps of Engineers, drink this water with oil in it and then maybe, as a Lakota I’ll consider your request,” Lafferty said. His demonstration did not count as official testimony.
Republican state Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, who sits on a state panel that regulates oil and gas, said the meeting was a fair process.
“I heard a comment saying, ‘This is no democratic way’ -- why, I think it very much is because you get a chance to say your piece,” he said.
About 150 to 200 people attended Wednesday’s meeting, Corps spokesperson Steve Wolf told The Associated Press. About 80 people gave oral testimony, taken down by two stenographers, which Wolf said enabled the Corps to receive more comments. The Corps received about 50 written comments.
“I understand the fact that some people want to be performative and try to create some kind of a fanfare in front of an audience of people, but that’s not the spirit and intent of the law or the meeting,” Wolf told the AP. The Corps is “absolutely on the right side of the law in how we’re doing this,” he said.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairwoman Janet Alkire last month called for the draft review to be invalidated, with a new one begun and the pipeline shut down.
A virtual meeting with only tribes is set for Nov. 8. The public comment meetings should be held on the reservation, said Peter Capossela, one of Standing Rock’s attorneys. The Bismarck meetings are more convenient for corporate executives and state officials than for tribal members who live as far as 120 miles (190 kilometers) away, he said.
“If the Army Corps is genuinely interested in hearing the views of tribal members and learning about the potential environmental impacts of an oil spill at the DAPL/Lake Oahe crossing, it would have held public hearings on the reservation that’s going to be polluted by a spill,” Capossela told the AP.
Wolf said the Corps is “being as open and transparent as we can possibly be through all of this, and nobody is being excluded from anything by us.”
State government and oil industry leaders view the pipeline as crucial infrastructure and the safest method for transporting oil, rather than by rail. Officials such as North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and U.S. Sen. John Hoeven have said they prefer the pipeline to continue operating as it has.
The public comment period ends Dec. 13. A final decision whether to grant or deny the easement is expected in late 2024.
veryGood! (329)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Vaping by high school students dropped this year, says US report
- Florida dentist charged in murder-for-hire case says he was a victim of extortion, not a killer
- Experts call Connecticut city’s ‘mishandled ballots’ a local and limited case, but skeptics disagree
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- 'Friends' co-creators tell NPR they will remember Matthew Perry for his heart
- 5 Things podcast: Climate change upending US fishing industry
- Dolly Parton Reveals Why She Turned Down Super Bowl Halftime Show Many Times
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Eviction filings in Arizona’s fast-growing Maricopa County surge amid a housing supply crisis
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- US applications for jobless benefits inch higher but remain at historically healthy levels
- Pennsylvania to partner with natural gas driller on in-depth study of air emissions, water quality
- US announces $440 million to install solar panels on low-income homes in Puerto Rico
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Vaping by high school students dropped this year, says US report
- Ole Miss to offer medical marijuana master's degree: Educating the workforce will lead to 'more informed consumer'
- Michael Phelps and Pregnant Wife Nicole Reveal Sex of Baby No. 4
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Cover crops help the climate and environment but most farmers say no. Many fear losing money
Georgia lawmakers launch investigation of troubled Fulton County Jail in Atlanta
Judge sets rules for research on potential jurors ahead of Trump’s 2020 election interference trial
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
Toyota recall: What to know about recall of nearly 2 million RAV4 SUVs
Thousands of Las Vegas Strip hotel workers at 18 casinos could go on strike this month
Trump eyes radical immigration shift if elected in 2024, promising mass deportations and ideological screenings